Date: 13 Jan 2010 Comments: 1

Real-time search, Bud!
Hey Bud, What’s Your Problem?
The typical high school experience does not have one definition or summary. It varies on a person-to-person basis, depends a great deal on the area you grew up and tends to fall somewhere in between The Best 4 Years Ever and 4 Years of Hell On Earth. Some people were celebrated as Jock Heroes of the Hall for their athletic exploits. Others were stuffed in lockers or mocked by the cool kids because they were deemed, well, not cool enough. Most of us spent those 4 years doing the best we could to get decent grades and keep as low a profile as possible. Regardless of your situation, I think one thing that can be agreed upon is that high school is a giant popularity contest.
To win the contest it was important to surround yourself with “friends” at lunch, during the passing period and on the weekends. It didn’t matter if you liked them all that much (or if they liked you) because the point was that quantity over quality was how you competed in the popularity contest.
Where am I going with this? Why am I reflecting on a long past era? It is not because I’ve turned thirty this year and am getting nostalgic about younger, wilder and less responsible days. It is because in a recent Technology Review article called How Google Ranks Tweets, Amit Singhal (A Google Fellow that lead the Real Time Search effort) stated that based on the number of followers one has on Twitter the greater the likelihood their Tweets will be given priority in real-time search results.
You Guys Are the Kings of the School
Here is the money quote: “You earn reputation, and then you give reputation. If lots of people follow you, and then you follow

Are you part of the cool Twitter crowd?
someone–then even though this [new person] does not have lots of followers,” his tweet is deemed valuable because his followers are themselves followed widely, Singhal says. It is “definitely, definitely” more than a popularity contest, he adds.
While Singhal was keen to add that Google is not making this a popularity contest if followers are being equated with links on actual web pages – Authority Links being of the most value – then aren’t Twitter users that want to increase their profile going to start gravitating towards as many possible Authority Users as possible?
Immediate counter-argument here is that the chances are people are already following “High-Quality” Twitter users. Especially if they are in an area of interest – work related or otherwise. This is a very good point. But I don’t think people that use a service like Twitter in a useful, non-spam manner want to follow thousands of other users. They are highly selective. In my opinion you cannot look at authority links and authority Twitter users in the same way. This is an apple to oranges comparison and Google has a long way to go to make real-time search valuable.
They Wanted Me to Get Socialized
The early result of this announcement is that many people will try to grow their Twitter following by seeking out highly followed people and sending them a Direct Message asking for a Follow in return. This is similar to the old days of link building where amateur SEOs were sending out mass emails to blogs and forums asking for links and blogroll additions. It only reinforces that Social Media is very much the Wild West in 2010.
I think this will eventually evolve to be a useful search tool. People that don’t care about SEO but love to see their Tweets at the top of Google will try to abuse the system (this would be most of the people that participate in the Trending Topics). Link building in its truest form is not a popularity contest. Link building is developing unique, highly valuable content that will get filtered throughout the internet. That is how you build rankings and authority (something called an algorithm…). Social Media remains who has the most followers, friends, etc.
Unfortunately, Google is jumping into the popularity contest and temporarily allowing search to be about how many friends you have at your lunch table.